Lights, camera, action: Difference between revisions

From Shifti
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m TSAT #26
 
category, formatting
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{byline|user=Rabbit|author=Rabbit}}
{{byline|user=Rabbit|author=Rabbit}}
[[Category:Phil Geusz]][[Category:Writers School]][[Category:Essays]]
[[Category:Essays by Phil Geusz]][[Category:Writers School]]
  <p>It's a sad fact that few literary critics want to admit: If you
want your work to be read by the masses, almost by definition
it <i>must</i> have action in it. Therefore, the ability to write action-packed
scenes is an essential skill in every writer's toolbox.</p>
  <p>Perhaps the key quality of good action fiction is that it is compelling.
It not only holds a reader's interest, but also rivets him so
thoroughly that he is actually resentful at the idea of having
his reading interrupted. It is the writer's duty to totally enmesh
his reader, and the more thoroughly he succeeds in doing so, the
more effective the action sequence will be.</p>
<p>As is almost always the case, the key to engaging a reader is
the use of emotion. In the case of most action sequences, the
emotions engaged will be suspense and fear. These are very intense
and direct emotions, which (I've always believed) is why action
sequences are often so memorable and vivid in the reader's mind.
Consider, for a moment, perhaps the greatest action sequence ever
filmed, the introduction to the James Bond movie <i><b>Moonraker</b>.</i> The movie opens with our protagonist in an airplane, fighting it out with his antagonists. During the course of the fight, Bond is left alone with no parachute in an airplane that is clearly about to crash. Yet Bond jumps out anyway, and with this act utterly rivets the filmgoer. <i>What in the world</i>? the viewer asks himself. <i>Why, Bond just killed himself for sure!</i> Our hero then controls his fall in an all-or-nothing gamble in
such a way as to collide in mid-air with one of his antagonists,
who in fact <i>does</i> have a parachute. A gritty fight scene follows, in which both
characters try to take control of the single parachute and thus
save their life, flailing about nearly helplessly in mid-air without
any solid ground to gain purchase on. Finally, of course, Bond
manages to liberate the 'chute from the bad guy, after which he
puts it on and -- at the <i>last</i> possible second -- pulls the ripcord .</p>


<p>There's a lot to be learned from this sequence, if one takes a
It's a sad fact that few literary critics want to admit: If you want your work to be read by the masses, almost by definition it ''must'' have action in it. Therefore, the ability to write action-packed scenes is an essential skill in every writer's toolbox.  
few moments to analyze it. One thing that is visible right off
is the sheer daring and vision of the writer that undertook to
script such a scene. On the face of it, after all, not only is
the basic premise a little ridiculous (after all, it takes time
to unstrap and restrap a parachute, especially from someone who
is resisting), but it borders on the corny. Yet the scene worked,
and worked very well indeed. The lesson here is that an action
writer needs to be daring, needs to be able to confront the ridiculous
and yet at the same time make it seem to be deadly serious. This
is not so difficult as it at first may seem, especially when one
realizes how often the ridiculous intrudes into deadly serious
situations in real life.</p>
<p>Another lesson to be learned from this classic bit of film is
that oftentimes the best action sequences are written in settings
that are unfamiliar and unconventional. Even back when <i><b>Moonraker</b></i> first aired, Bond had probably already defeated a hundred bad
guys using his fists alone. Yet he had never done so in mid-air
before, with the wind rushing past him and the ground rising up
to kill him like a videotape on fast-forward. The average person
has never had to think about the difficulties of hand-to-hand
combat under such ridiculous conditions; punches are weakened,
judo will not work, karate-kicks are useless. This means that
the reader/viewer is covering fresh ground, and intrinsically
cannot know what to expect next. This greatly aids the writer
in building a sense of suspense.</p>
<p>Also vital to this scene is its sense of continual desperate improvisation.
Not only did Bond have to physically defeat his enemies, he had
to outthink them through an entire series of impossible situations
as well. The sheer brilliance and daring of Bond's plan is a major
part of the appeal of this scene, and the fact that he had to
come up with it on the spur of the moment merely adds to the success
of it all. I personally am very taken with this method of inducing
suspense, and try to take advantage of it at every opportunity.
One trick that I often employ is for my protagonist to develop
some sort of plan to get out of a tight spot. This plan must be
both credible and believable to the reader, so that he perceives
it as <i>the</i> way out. Then I have the first few steps of the plan go perfectly,
until something totally unforeseen and unforeseeable goes wrong,
preferably leaving the protagonist standing naked in the center
of a well-manicured football field, with about ten thousand bad
guys armed with machine guns shooting at him. From this point
the protagonist <i>must</i> improvise, improvise quickly, and improvise well. The totally
unexpected development is a surprisingly effective technique for
getting readers hooked.</p>


<p>Finally, the wordsmithing of action-writing is special, and deserving
Perhaps the key quality of good action fiction is that it is compelling. It not only holds a reader's interest, but also rivets him so thoroughly that he is actually resentful at the idea of having his reading interrupted. It is the writer's duty to totally enmesh his reader, and the more thoroughly he succeeds in doing so, the more effective the action sequence will be.
of mention. While an action scene does not by definition demand
 
physical exertion, it does seem to require a sense of excitement
As is almost always the case, the key to engaging a reader is the use of emotion. In the case of most action sequences, the emotions engaged will be suspense and fear. These are very intense and direct emotions, which (I've always believed) is why action sequences are often so memorable and vivid in the reader's mind. Consider, for a moment, perhaps the greatest action sequence ever filmed, the introduction to the James Bond movie '''''Moonraker'''.'' The movie opens with our protagonist in an airplane, fighting it out with his antagonists. During the course of the fight, Bond is left alone with no parachute in an airplane that is clearly about to crash. Yet Bond jumps out anyway, and with this act utterly rivets the filmgoer. ''What in the world''? the viewer asks himself. ''Why, Bond just killed himself for sure!'' Our hero then controls his fall in an all-or-nothing gamble in such a way as to collide in mid-air with one of his antagonists, who in fact ''does'' have a parachute. A gritty fight scene follows, in which both characters try to take control of the single parachute and thus save their life, flailing about nearly helplessly in mid-air without any solid ground to gain purchase on. Finally, of course, Bond manages to liberate the 'chute from the bad guy, after which he puts it on and -- at the ''last'' possible second -- pulls the ripcord .
and tension. The human body exhibits very definite and specific
 
reactions to this kind of stress; the heart rate increases, breathing
There's a lot to be learned from this sequence, if one takes a few moments to analyze it. One thing that is visible right off is the sheer daring and vision of the writer that undertook to script such a scene. On the face of it, after all, not only is the basic premise a little ridiculous (after all, it takes time to unstrap and restrap a parachute, especially from someone who is resisting), but it borders on the corny. Yet the scene worked, and worked very well indeed. The lesson here is that an action writer needs to be daring, needs to be able to confront the ridiculous and yet at the same time make it seem to be deadly serious. This is not so difficult as it at first may seem, especially when one realizes how often the ridiculous intrudes into deadly serious situations in real life.
speeds up, and details of the environment seem to jump out and
 
demand attention. By mimicking these physiological reactions in
Another lesson to be learned from this classic bit of film is that oftentimes the best action sequences are written in settings that are unfamiliar and unconventional. Even back when '''''Moonraker''''' first aired, Bond had probably already defeated a hundred bad guys using his fists alone. Yet he had never done so in mid-air before, with the wind rushing past him and the ground rising up to kill him like a videotape on fast-forward. The average person has never had to think about the difficulties of hand-to-hand combat under such ridiculous conditions; punches are weakened, judo will not work, karate-kicks are useless. This means that the reader/viewer is covering fresh ground, and intrinsically cannot know what to expect next. This greatly aids the writer in building a sense of suspense.
prose, the writer can convey an almost subliminal sense of danger
 
that creates considerable emotional impact. Speeches should be
Also vital to this scene is its sense of continual desperate improvisation. Not only did Bond have to physically defeat his enemies, he had to outthink them through an entire series of impossible situations as well. The sheer brilliance and daring of Bond's plan is a major part of the appeal of this scene, and the fact that he had to come up with it on the spur of the moment merely adds to the success of it all. I personally am very taken with this method of inducing suspense, and try to take advantage of it at every opportunity. One trick that I often employ is for my protagonist to develop some sort of plan to get out of a tight spot. This plan must be both credible and believable to the reader, so that he perceives it as ''the'' way out. Then I have the first few steps of the plan go perfectly, until something totally unforeseen and unforeseeable goes wrong, preferably leaving the protagonist standing naked in the center of a well-manicured football field, with about ten thousand bad guys armed with machine guns shooting at him. From this point the protagonist ''must'' improvise, improvise quickly, and improvise well. The totally unexpected development is a surprisingly effective technique for getting readers hooked.
short and direct, as if the speaker was short on breath. Similarly,
 
sentences should be clipped and commas (which slow things down,
Finally, the wordsmithing of action-writing is special, and deserving of mention. While an action scene does not by definition demand physical exertion, it does seem to require a sense of excitement and tension. The human body exhibits very definite and specific reactions to this kind of stress; the heart rate increases, breathing speeds up, and details of the environment seem to jump out and demand attention. By mimicking these physiological reactions in prose, the writer can convey an almost subliminal sense of danger that creates considerable emotional impact. Speeches should be short and direct, as if the speaker was short on breath. Similarly, sentences should be clipped and commas (which slow things down, exactly the opposite of what you want) avoided whenever possible. Beginning writers tend to write in overly-long sentences to begin with; in action scenes, a fair proportion of sentences should be of four words or less. Another facet of this phenomenon is paragraph length; in action sequences, more than anywhere else, some paragraphs ought to consist of a single, flat, declarative sentence.  
exactly the opposite of what you want) avoided whenever possible.
 
Beginning writers tend to write in overly-long sentences to begin
Keep it short, keep it fast, keep it unpredictable; those are my rules of thumb when I sit down to write action. These guidelines have served me well. May they bring just as much success to your literary endeavors.
with; in action scenes, a fair proportion of sentences should
be of four words or less. Another facet of this phenomenon is
paragraph length; in action sequences, more than anywhere else,
some paragraphs ought to consist of a single, flat, declarative
sentence.</p>
<p>Keep it short, keep it fast, keep it unpredictable; those are
my rules of thumb when I sit down to write action. These guidelines
have served me well. May they bring just as much success to your
literary endeavors. </p>

Latest revision as of 04:10, 7 March 2008

{{#ifeq: | | {{#ifeq: Rabbit | |

   {{#ifeq: Rabbit | || 
     Author: Rabbit  
   }} | 
   {{#ifeq: Rabbit | |
     Author: Rabbit |
     Author: Rabbit  
   }}
 }} |
 {{#ifeq: Rabbit | |
   {{#ifeq: Rabbit | | Authors: ' | 
     Authors: Rabbit 
   }} | 
   {{#ifeq: Rabbit | |
     Authors: Rabbit |
     Author: Rabbit 
   }}
 }}

}} {{#if:| — see also [[:Category:{{{category}}}|other works by this author]]}}


It's a sad fact that few literary critics want to admit: If you want your work to be read by the masses, almost by definition it must have action in it. Therefore, the ability to write action-packed scenes is an essential skill in every writer's toolbox.

Perhaps the key quality of good action fiction is that it is compelling. It not only holds a reader's interest, but also rivets him so thoroughly that he is actually resentful at the idea of having his reading interrupted. It is the writer's duty to totally enmesh his reader, and the more thoroughly he succeeds in doing so, the more effective the action sequence will be.

As is almost always the case, the key to engaging a reader is the use of emotion. In the case of most action sequences, the emotions engaged will be suspense and fear. These are very intense and direct emotions, which (I've always believed) is why action sequences are often so memorable and vivid in the reader's mind. Consider, for a moment, perhaps the greatest action sequence ever filmed, the introduction to the James Bond movie Moonraker. The movie opens with our protagonist in an airplane, fighting it out with his antagonists. During the course of the fight, Bond is left alone with no parachute in an airplane that is clearly about to crash. Yet Bond jumps out anyway, and with this act utterly rivets the filmgoer. What in the world? the viewer asks himself. Why, Bond just killed himself for sure! Our hero then controls his fall in an all-or-nothing gamble in such a way as to collide in mid-air with one of his antagonists, who in fact does have a parachute. A gritty fight scene follows, in which both characters try to take control of the single parachute and thus save their life, flailing about nearly helplessly in mid-air without any solid ground to gain purchase on. Finally, of course, Bond manages to liberate the 'chute from the bad guy, after which he puts it on and -- at the last possible second -- pulls the ripcord .

There's a lot to be learned from this sequence, if one takes a few moments to analyze it. One thing that is visible right off is the sheer daring and vision of the writer that undertook to script such a scene. On the face of it, after all, not only is the basic premise a little ridiculous (after all, it takes time to unstrap and restrap a parachute, especially from someone who is resisting), but it borders on the corny. Yet the scene worked, and worked very well indeed. The lesson here is that an action writer needs to be daring, needs to be able to confront the ridiculous and yet at the same time make it seem to be deadly serious. This is not so difficult as it at first may seem, especially when one realizes how often the ridiculous intrudes into deadly serious situations in real life.

Another lesson to be learned from this classic bit of film is that oftentimes the best action sequences are written in settings that are unfamiliar and unconventional. Even back when Moonraker first aired, Bond had probably already defeated a hundred bad guys using his fists alone. Yet he had never done so in mid-air before, with the wind rushing past him and the ground rising up to kill him like a videotape on fast-forward. The average person has never had to think about the difficulties of hand-to-hand combat under such ridiculous conditions; punches are weakened, judo will not work, karate-kicks are useless. This means that the reader/viewer is covering fresh ground, and intrinsically cannot know what to expect next. This greatly aids the writer in building a sense of suspense.

Also vital to this scene is its sense of continual desperate improvisation. Not only did Bond have to physically defeat his enemies, he had to outthink them through an entire series of impossible situations as well. The sheer brilliance and daring of Bond's plan is a major part of the appeal of this scene, and the fact that he had to come up with it on the spur of the moment merely adds to the success of it all. I personally am very taken with this method of inducing suspense, and try to take advantage of it at every opportunity. One trick that I often employ is for my protagonist to develop some sort of plan to get out of a tight spot. This plan must be both credible and believable to the reader, so that he perceives it as the way out. Then I have the first few steps of the plan go perfectly, until something totally unforeseen and unforeseeable goes wrong, preferably leaving the protagonist standing naked in the center of a well-manicured football field, with about ten thousand bad guys armed with machine guns shooting at him. From this point the protagonist must improvise, improvise quickly, and improvise well. The totally unexpected development is a surprisingly effective technique for getting readers hooked.

Finally, the wordsmithing of action-writing is special, and deserving of mention. While an action scene does not by definition demand physical exertion, it does seem to require a sense of excitement and tension. The human body exhibits very definite and specific reactions to this kind of stress; the heart rate increases, breathing speeds up, and details of the environment seem to jump out and demand attention. By mimicking these physiological reactions in prose, the writer can convey an almost subliminal sense of danger that creates considerable emotional impact. Speeches should be short and direct, as if the speaker was short on breath. Similarly, sentences should be clipped and commas (which slow things down, exactly the opposite of what you want) avoided whenever possible. Beginning writers tend to write in overly-long sentences to begin with; in action scenes, a fair proportion of sentences should be of four words or less. Another facet of this phenomenon is paragraph length; in action sequences, more than anywhere else, some paragraphs ought to consist of a single, flat, declarative sentence.

Keep it short, keep it fast, keep it unpredictable; those are my rules of thumb when I sit down to write action. These guidelines have served me well. May they bring just as much success to your literary endeavors.