Talk:Catprog's Favorites

Minor changes

When you're doing small edits, please click on the "This is a minor edit" check box below the summary field. Thanks. --Buck 12:15, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

You can also edit your user preferences to automatically flag all of your edits as minor, unless you uncheck that box on the edit. And you can edit your preferences to create a java-recent changes list that compresses all recent changes into an (expandable) list. --Jetfire 14:09, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

And, since this is after all a fairly small wiki still whose recent changes aren't hard to keep on top of currently, all this isn't really that important to worry about if it seems like a big hassle. Content first. :) Bryan 14:48, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Formatting

This list has bulked up quite nicely. Would you like any assistance with fancying up the formatting? I extended the offer to Devin so I should make the same offer here, though if you prefer a nice simple bullet point list that's perfectly fine. Bryan 13:54, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

a bit of help would be nice Catprog 22:47, 13 June 2008 (EDT)

Certainly. What sort of layout would you like to see? We could do a simple table, or use templates to get fancy. If you want to reuse the icons I'm using over on Bryan's picks, that's fine too - or if you need new ones not present over there, we could find some free stuff or I could whip something up. What information would you like to present in your list? Some sort of quality rating, a genre or type of TF indicator, a blurb?

Oh, I just noticed User:Catprog/Template:Test. Since it isn't in the template namespace, to use it in testing you'll need to include the full name: {{User:Catprog/Template:Test}}. Just so you know. Bryan 16:14, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

What about something like on my user page at the moment? Catprog 22:22, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Because of the way addresses are generated in the parser what Bryan mentions holds for any use. {{User:Catprog/Template:Test}} is the only way to call it. ShadowWolf 03:23, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

There, just did a little tinkering. I modified the table slightly to make its layout clearer; the text in the separate columns had no distinguishing separation between them before. Once we've got the contents defined we can look into the visual styling in more detail. The sortability's a very nice feature, I'd use it myself if it didn't mess up the colspanning headers over on Bryan's picks. :) The number of columns could become unwieldy if you're not careful, though. Also, I note that there's no author field. A deliberate choice, or an oversight?

I've also whipped up a very basic template for adding rows in a standardized manner. I inserted one as an example. I used raw HTML in the template because MediaWiki's preprocessor can get complicated sometimes when dealing with templates and tables, this way there's less opportunity for odd results. Bryan 04:06, 15 June 2008 (EDT)