User talk:JonBuck/Open Secrets - Revision history

Robotech Master: /* Pun intentional? */

2009-06-08T18:33:15Z

Pun intentional?

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 8 June 2009
Line 53:		Line 53:

	:It wasn't intentional, I swear. :) --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 01:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)		:It wasn't intentional, I swear. :) --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 01:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

			::Well, it's funny enough that you ''should'' take credit for it anyway. :) —[[User:Robotech Master\|Robotech Master]] 18:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

2009-06-08T01:33:29Z

Pun intentional?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 7 June 2009
Line 51:		Line 51:

	Was it merely coincidence that the "shoe field" failed in the same story in which Frasier turned into a "Doc Marten"? :) —[[User:Robotech Master\|Robotech Master]] 00:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)		Was it merely coincidence that the "shoe field" failed in the same story in which Frasier turned into a "Doc Marten"? :) —[[User:Robotech Master\|Robotech Master]] 00:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

			:It wasn't intentional, I swear. :) --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 01:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

2009-06-08T00:54:42Z

Pun intentional?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 7 June 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:

	--[[User:Jetfire\|Jetfire]] 09:18, 30 May 2008 (EDT)		--[[User:Jetfire\|Jetfire]] 09:18, 30 May 2008 (EDT)

			== Pun intentional? ==

			I've just ''got'' to know.

			Was it merely coincidence that the "shoe field" failed in the same story in which Frasier turned into a "Doc Marten"? :) —[[User:Robotech Master\|Robotech Master]] 00:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

2008-05-30T13:18:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 30 May 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:

	I hope you'll be coming back to us soon with this, Jon. If you need any help of any sort, let me know. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 17:07, 9 May 2008 (EDT)		I hope you'll be coming back to us soon with this, Jon. If you need any help of any sort, let me know. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 17:07, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

			Nice to see things picking up again (and not just in the story), and glad you're getting back into the writing mood.

			Welcome back! :)

			--[[User:Jetfire\|Jetfire]] 09:18, 30 May 2008 (EDT)

2008-05-09T21:07:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 9 May 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:
	I was wondering about the Veil Piercing glasses, if you filmed something through the glasses (ie make a lens for the camera the same way, or just film it directly through the glasses), if unChanged would be able to see any Changed that were recorded that way?		I was wondering about the Veil Piercing glasses, if you filmed something through the glasses (ie make a lens for the camera the same way, or just film it directly through the glasses), if unChanged would be able to see any Changed that were recorded that way?
	--[[User:Jetfire\|Jetfire]] 09:18, 6 May 2008 (EDT)		--[[User:Jetfire\|Jetfire]] 09:18, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

			== Hiatus ==

			I hope you'll be coming back to us soon with this, Jon. If you need any help of any sort, let me know. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 17:07, 9 May 2008 (EDT)

2008-05-06T13:18:27Z

The Glasses...

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 6 May 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:

	:I'd fixed it on Shifti, but not the Word file. Didn't realize it until after the copy-paste. I'll correct it on the next go around. --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 12:15, 3 April 2008 (EDT)		:I'd fixed it on Shifti, but not the Word file. Didn't realize it until after the copy-paste. I'll correct it on the next go around. --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 12:15, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

			== The Glasses... ==

			I was wondering about the Veil Piercing glasses, if you filmed something through the glasses (ie make a lens for the camera the same way, or just film it directly through the glasses), if unChanged would be able to see any Changed that were recorded that way?
			--[[User:Jetfire\|Jetfire]] 09:18, 6 May 2008 (EDT)

2008-04-03T16:15:41Z

The Doubling Study

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:15, 3 April 2008
Line 28:		Line 28:

	Just so you know, your latest edit put me back to changing in 97 instead of 96. You might want to correct that. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 05:14, 3 April 2008 (EDT)		Just so you know, your latest edit put me back to changing in 97 instead of 96. You might want to correct that. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 05:14, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

			:I'd fixed it on Shifti, but not the Word file. Didn't realize it until after the copy-paste. I'll correct it on the next go around. --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 12:15, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

2008-04-03T09:14:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 3 April 2008
Line 26:		Line 26:

	::Okay, that's fair enough. You have my approval to use my characters as you like. I'm so far in the past I can make anything work at this point. I'll let you know if there are any details to be fixed as I did before. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 05:09, 2 April 2008 (EDT)		::Okay, that's fair enough. You have my approval to use my characters as you like. I'm so far in the past I can make anything work at this point. I'll let you know if there are any details to be fixed as I did before. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 05:09, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

			Just so you know, your latest edit put me back to changing in 97 instead of 96. You might want to correct that. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 05:14, 3 April 2008 (EDT)

2008-04-02T09:09:17Z

The Doubling Study

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 2 April 2008
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:I didn't want to include him directly without your approval. I can easily have him appear in a later scene. I've written more than what's been posted, and I'll get it up once I get home now that Shifti is back. Perhaps I can have the PA Senator call Lundh and Chris in. --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 18:38, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		:I didn't want to include him directly without your approval. I can easily have him appear in a later scene. I've written more than what's been posted, and I'll get it up once I get home now that Shifti is back. Perhaps I can have the PA Senator call Lundh and Chris in. --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 18:38, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

			::Okay, that's fair enough. You have my approval to use my characters as you like. I'm so far in the past I can make anything work at this point. I'll let you know if there are any details to be fixed as I did before. --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 05:09, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

2008-04-01T22:38:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 1 April 2008
Line 22:		Line 22:

	As for Christopher, he first changed in 1996, not 1997. I thought you were considering having him be a part of this? --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 17:56, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		As for Christopher, he first changed in 1996, not 1997. I thought you were considering having him be a part of this? --[[User:MatthiasRat\|MatthiasRat]] 17:56, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

			:I didn't want to include him directly without your approval. I can easily have him appear in a later scene. I've written more than what's been posted, and I'll get it up once I get home now that Shifti is back. Perhaps I can have the PA Senator call Lundh and Chris in. --[[User:JonBuck\|Buck]] 18:38, 1 April 2008 (EDT)