<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://shifti.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_proper_tool</id>
	<title>The proper tool - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://shifti.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=The_proper_tool"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://shifti.org/index.php?title=The_proper_tool&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-10-03T20:28:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0-alpha</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://shifti.org/index.php?title=The_proper_tool&amp;diff=6726&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Bryan: category, formatting</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://shifti.org/index.php?title=The_proper_tool&amp;diff=6726&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-03-07T09:32:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;category, formatting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://shifti.org/index.php?title=The_proper_tool&amp;amp;diff=6726&amp;amp;oldid=5029&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Bryan</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://shifti.org/index.php?title=The_proper_tool&amp;diff=5029&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ShadowWolf: TSAT #31</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://shifti.org/index.php?title=The_proper_tool&amp;diff=5029&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2008-01-09T04:33:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;TSAT #31&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{byline|user=Rabbit|author=Rabbit}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Phil Geusz]][[Category:Essays]][[Category:Writers School]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I&amp;#039;m not much of a writer, really. Much of the time I feel half-apologetic&lt;br /&gt;
		about writing this column, which purports to give writing advice.&lt;br /&gt;
		Yet for once at least I have a topic I feel comfortable with.&lt;br /&gt;
		This month, I am going to discuss the working tools of a writer.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Homer may have memorized his epics, but virtually every other&lt;br /&gt;
		writer since his time has been compelled to write his or her work&lt;br /&gt;
		down one way or another. First goose quills gave way to pens with&lt;br /&gt;
		nibs, then fountain pens, and from there writers moved on to the&lt;br /&gt;
		typewriter. Today, however, the vast majority of all writers work&lt;br /&gt;
		with electronic computer-based word processors, though a few still&lt;br /&gt;
		write out everything out in longhand before, most commonly, typing&lt;br /&gt;
		it into the ubiquitous word processor.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;For the most part, the word processor has been a tremendous boon&lt;br /&gt;
		to the writer. Indeed, it has been &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;such&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; a tremendous boon that I&amp;#039;ve heard more than one knowledgeable&lt;br /&gt;
		literary type credit the current explosion of submissions and&lt;br /&gt;
		manuscripts at the various publishing houses to the invention&lt;br /&gt;
		and popularization of the word processor. In my case, I am quite&lt;br /&gt;
		certain, I would never have begun writing without computer assistance;&lt;br /&gt;
		my typing skills were atrocious before I began writing novels,&lt;br /&gt;
		and are only somewhat improved after thousands of hours of practice.&lt;br /&gt;
		Without a word processor, my stories would be only half-legible&lt;br /&gt;
		at best, even typed. Yet, because of the fact that current technology&lt;br /&gt;
		makes it possible for me to back up and correct typing errors&lt;br /&gt;
		without physically erasing them, it has become possible for me&lt;br /&gt;
		to actually produce at least acceptable-looking documents. (Sadly,&lt;br /&gt;
		far too many typos still seem to slip through, despite electronic&lt;br /&gt;
		aid.) The word processor, then, is in my opinion the first and&lt;br /&gt;
		most essential of a writer&amp;#039;s tools. Sure, you &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;could&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; get by with an ordinary typewriter. But why bother?&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Today, the word processor is most commonly available in three&lt;br /&gt;
		forms. The desktop computer is by the far the most common, as&lt;br /&gt;
		well as the cheapest. In the United States, at least, pretty much&lt;br /&gt;
		anyone can afford a used one. For those who cannot or will not&lt;br /&gt;
		make the investment, most public libraries have desktop machines&lt;br /&gt;
		available which the general public can use for free. If you choose&lt;br /&gt;
		to go with a desktop for writing purposes, I would suggest that&lt;br /&gt;
		it be set up in the most private, quiet, comfortable place you&lt;br /&gt;
		can manage. If you&amp;#039;re serious about writing, you&amp;#039;ll be spending&lt;br /&gt;
		many, many hours in company with your desktop, cursing every interruption.&lt;br /&gt;
		Though I am well aware that many (particularly younger) desktop&lt;br /&gt;
		users will disagree with me, as a middle-aged man I find that&lt;br /&gt;
		using a LCD-type monitor significantly reduces headaches and eyestrain,&lt;br /&gt;
		and lets me put in more and longer writing sessions. Indeed, I&amp;#039;ve&lt;br /&gt;
		suggested changing monitors to several other writers my own age,&lt;br /&gt;
		and almost every one claims that doing so has made writing easier&lt;br /&gt;
		for them. I would submit that if older eyes can easily detect&lt;br /&gt;
		the difference, then even young eyes stand to benefit from a flicker-free,&lt;br /&gt;
		LCD monitor.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Laptop computers automatically come with LCD screens, and in my&lt;br /&gt;
		opinion this is only one of their many virtues. They are also&lt;br /&gt;
		portable, meaning that the writer can easily move his or her &amp;#039;office&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
		from one room to another, or indeed from one physical location&lt;br /&gt;
		to another. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Every&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; writer is subject to writer&amp;#039;s block from time to time, and one&lt;br /&gt;
		of the best cures I&amp;#039;ve found is to take my laptop with me to a&lt;br /&gt;
		restaurant and compose there. (Indeed, I am merrily typing these&lt;br /&gt;
		very words in a Steak and Shake at about 3AM.) Since I always&lt;br /&gt;
		have my faithful machine with me, I can fill otherwise &amp;#039;dead&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
		time with editing and beta-reading the work of other writers.&lt;br /&gt;
		My current laptop is the third such machine I&amp;#039;ve owned; the first&lt;br /&gt;
		was a fragile first-generation unit that promised more than it&lt;br /&gt;
		could deliver and fell apart quickly, while the second was a medium-priced,&lt;br /&gt;
		medium-sized machine whose keyboard I literally wore out in a&lt;br /&gt;
		year and a half. My current, third laptop is a heavy-duty &amp;#039;desktop&lt;br /&gt;
		replacement&amp;#039; type that feels as if it were made of lead when I&lt;br /&gt;
		carry it. It has a 15.7&amp;quot; screen, however, which helps a lot with&lt;br /&gt;
		my aging eyes, and best of all it is of the hard-to-find &amp;#039;two&lt;br /&gt;
		bay&amp;#039; design that allows me to rig it up with two internal batteries&lt;br /&gt;
		for an honest six uninterrupted hours of typing. Yes, my laptop&lt;br /&gt;
		is heavy and awkward to carry about with me. But when it comes&lt;br /&gt;
		time to actually &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;use&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; the thing, the experience is so pleasant that in point of fact&lt;br /&gt;
		I rarely use my desktop at all anymore; it&amp;#039;s pretty much been&lt;br /&gt;
		relegated to mere back-up status. Indeed, next time I upgrade&lt;br /&gt;
		I fully intend to buy another laptop, and keep this current one&lt;br /&gt;
		on my desk as the new backup unit. In my opinion, laptops have&lt;br /&gt;
		come so far and the prices have become so competitive with desktop&lt;br /&gt;
		units that there is little reason to own anything else.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Besides, it&amp;#039;s &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;really&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; fun to hook the laptop to my cell-phone and e-mail my hen-scratchings&lt;br /&gt;
		directly from the restaurant to my publisher. I admit it, I&amp;#039;m&lt;br /&gt;
		old. But it feels &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;so&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; James Bond!&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;I don&amp;#039;t yet have much experience with PDAs, the third commonly available form of word-processor. However, my working conditions have just changed, making it very difficult for me to carry a laptop on the job. Since a remarkably high percentage of my writing and editing currently gets done in odd bits of spare time at work, I&amp;#039;ve had to find another way. The solution I intend to try is a Pocket-PC type PDA with a folding keyboard. These units appear on the surface to be remarkably capable, though only practical experience will allow me to say for sure. The Word-Lite program that these devices employ lacks a thesaurus, which is a feature that I often want, desire, lust for, covet, crave, long for, and seek after. Nor am I looking forward to using the teeny-tiny screen after the luxury of my 15.7&amp;quot; laptop. However, the setup I currently have on order from Amazon.com is costing me less than $350, including PDA, keyboard, and a 256 meg chip that ought to hold my entire inventory of manuscripts. I can&amp;#039;t hook my cell-phone up to it, though the tech is probably getting there. But I must say that for the budget-minded, or for those who cannot carry a laptop much of the time, as I soon will not be able to, it looks like a very viable and economical alternative.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Most of the rest of a writer&amp;#039;s tools are pretty straightforward.&lt;br /&gt;
		A writer desperately needs a good, reliable means of backing up&lt;br /&gt;
		his work other than on his machine&amp;#039;s hard drive; there are many&lt;br /&gt;
		good alternatives on the market. Personally, I&amp;#039;m still looking&lt;br /&gt;
		for a software setup that will allow me to centralize the output&lt;br /&gt;
		of all three of my machines into one location, so that if I edit&lt;br /&gt;
		a story on my laptop the system automatically updates the files&lt;br /&gt;
		in my desktop and PDA. &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Any&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; form of backup, however, is better than none.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;A writer also needs a good chair, a comfortable desk, and things&lt;br /&gt;
		like good air circulation to keep him fully awake. If the act&lt;br /&gt;
		of writing is physically uncomfortable, it becomes unpleasant&lt;br /&gt;
		and the prospective author will do far less of it. For this reason,&lt;br /&gt;
		I also recommend nice comfortable background lighting or perhaps&lt;br /&gt;
		even an illuminated keyboard. Every little bit helps; Stephen&lt;br /&gt;
		King wrote &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Carrie&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;,&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; the first book he sold, in the laundry room of a crowded house-trailer,&lt;br /&gt;
		balancing a typewriter across his thighs and trying not to notice&lt;br /&gt;
		the kids screaming in the next room. Unfortunately, most of us&lt;br /&gt;
		are not Stephen King. We need all the help that we can get.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;It&amp;#039;s not an easy thing to become a skilled writer, not easy at&lt;br /&gt;
		all. Having the proper tools, as simple as it sounds, can go a&lt;br /&gt;
		long way towards making the job easier. If you&amp;#039;re truly serious&lt;br /&gt;
		about your writing, I strongly recommend that you grit your teeth,&lt;br /&gt;
		make the investment, and obtain the best writing equipment that&lt;br /&gt;
		you can possibly afford or that will fit your personal situation.&lt;br /&gt;
		Doing so will not only make your task far easier, but may even&lt;br /&gt;
		spell the difference between success and failure.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ShadowWolf</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>